Re: [Plperlng-devel] Re: Concern about new PL/Perl

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PL/Perl <plperlng-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Plperlng-devel] Re: Concern about new PL/Perl
Date: 2004-11-19 04:11:14
Message-ID: 23144.1100837474@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> I would agree that seems a little odd ;). Would this be something we
>> want done for 8.0?

> I think we'd better. Otherwise, people will get used to the broken syntax.

Agreed. Someone's going to step up and patch this, no?

(Not me --- I've already wasted more hours than I could afford this week
on plperl.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-11-19 04:15:07 Re: [Plperlng-devel] Re: Concern about new PL/Perl
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-11-19 04:04:10 Re: Can postgresql accept mutliple connections in the same instance?