Re: Make documentation builds reproducible

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tristan Partin <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Make documentation builds reproducible
Date: 2024-01-20 22:44:00
Message-ID: 4197bc82-639f-49d7-bd10-cb341dc7b7f4@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 20.01.24 17:03, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
>> I think there was general agreement with what this patch is doing, but I
>> guess it's too boring to actually review the patch in detail. Let's
>> say, if there are no objections, I'll go ahead and commit it.
>
> I re-read the thread and have two thoughts:
>
> * We worried about whether this change would be compatible with a
> (presently unreleased) version of docbook that contains the upstreamed
> fix. It seems unlikely that there's a problem, but maybe worth
> checking?

The code in the patch is the same code as upstream, so it would behave
the same as a new release.

> * I gather that the point here is to change some generated anchor
> tags. Would any of these tags be things people would be likely
> to have bookmarked?

No, because the problem is that the anchor names are randomly generated
in each build.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-01-20 22:57:46 Re: PG12 change to DO UPDATE SET column references
Previous Message James Coleman 2024-01-20 21:45:07 Re: PG12 change to DO UPDATE SET column references