From: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die |
Date: | 2004-11-05 15:44:18 |
Message-ID: | 418B9FD2.2090607@bigfoot.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Freitag, 5. November 2004 14:13 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
>
>>I'll repeat an observation I made (more or less) last time we had this
>>discussion: the loudest voice in it belongs to those who actually use
>>the repository most. When Tom or Bruce or Peter (for example) tell us we
>>need to change I'll take lots more notice.
>
>
> I'm certainly open to considering subversion, although I have a certain
> traumatic experience with it that may or may not be related to the BDB
> backend that it uses.
>
> I think for a start it would be nice if pgfoundry could optionally offer
> subversion (and/or arch) for source control, so that some developer groups
> and also our system administrators could get some experience with it.
I good very start point is see if cvs2svn can handle the postgresql CVS without
errors.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-11-05 15:46:38 | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die |
Previous Message | Joachim Wieland | 2004-11-05 15:28:38 | Documentation on PITR still scarce |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-11-05 15:46:38 | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-11-05 15:22:55 | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die |