From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die |
Date: | 2004-11-05 15:22:55 |
Message-ID: | 200411051622.55820.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Am Freitag, 5. November 2004 14:13 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
> I'll repeat an observation I made (more or less) last time we had this
> discussion: the loudest voice in it belongs to those who actually use
> the repository most. When Tom or Bruce or Peter (for example) tell us we
> need to change I'll take lots more notice.
I'm certainly open to considering subversion, although I have a certain
traumatic experience with it that may or may not be related to the BDB
backend that it uses.
I think for a start it would be nice if pgfoundry could optionally offer
subversion (and/or arch) for source control, so that some developer groups
and also our system administrators could get some experience with it.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joachim Wieland | 2004-11-05 15:28:38 | Documentation on PITR still scarce |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-11-05 14:24:31 | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-11-05 15:44:18 | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-11-05 14:24:31 | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die |