Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
Cc: Joerg Hessdoerfer <Joerg(dot)Hessdoerfer(at)sea-gmbh(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Date: 2004-11-05 12:36:32
Message-ID: 418B73D0.6000705@samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> Another compelling reason to use SVN is that one of their long term
> goals is to use an SQL backend.

That is about as far from a "compelling reason" to use a particular
version control system as I can imagine.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gaetano Mendola 2004-11-05 12:48:22 Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...
Previous Message Neil Conway 2004-11-05 12:33:06 Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-11-05 13:13:18 Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Previous Message Thomas Hallgren 2004-11-05 12:28:25 Re: CVS should die