Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...
Date: 2004-11-05 12:33:06
Message-ID: 418B7302.8080803@samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> Right but we can create a new segment and use it too. I don't know how
> these segments are used but I used to do it in the past, of course you have
> to create a memory manager that handle not ccntinuous segments.

The TelegraphCQ folks have already done this:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-05/msg00336.php

I haven't had a chance to look at the patch, though.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2004-11-05 12:36:32 Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Previous Message Thomas Hallgren 2004-11-05 12:28:25 Re: CVS should die

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gaetano Mendola 2004-11-05 12:48:22 Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2004-11-05 12:00:56 Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...