From: | Michael Guerin <guerin(at)rentec(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas? |
Date: | 2004-10-29 19:57:18 |
Message-ID: | 4182A09E.5000608@rentec.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Michael Guerin <guerin(at)rentec(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>Postgresql just reset itself, this is what I found in the log.
>>FATAL: block 26 of 1663/17228/3425958479 is still referenced (local 2)
>>LOG: server process (PID 1887) exited with exit code 1
>>LOG: terminating any other active server processes
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>pg version: 8 beta3
>>
>>
>
>You sure that's beta3? Because we reduced that error condition from
>FATAL to ERROR between beta2 and beta3. (And fixed the bug I think
>you hit, too.)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
fiasco=> select version();
version
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 8.0.0beta3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC)
3.3.1 (SuSE Linux)
(1 row)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-29 20:01:03 | Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-29 19:52:48 | Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-29 20:01:03 | Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-29 19:52:48 | Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas? |