Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas?

From: Michael Guerin <guerin(at)rentec(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas?
Date: 2004-10-29 19:57:18
Message-ID: 4182A09E.5000608@rentec.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice

Tom Lane wrote:

>Michael Guerin <guerin(at)rentec(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>Postgresql just reset itself, this is what I found in the log.
>>FATAL: block 26 of 1663/17228/3425958479 is still referenced (local 2)
>>LOG: server process (PID 1887) exited with exit code 1
>>LOG: terminating any other active server processes
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>pg version: 8 beta3
>>
>>
>
>You sure that's beta3? Because we reduced that error condition from
>FATAL to ERROR between beta2 and beta3. (And fixed the bug I think
>you hit, too.)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
fiasco=> select version();
version
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 8.0.0beta3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC)
3.3.1 (SuSE Linux)
(1 row)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-29 20:01:03 Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-10-29 19:52:48 Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas?

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-29 20:01:03 Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-10-29 19:52:48 Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas?