| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Guerin <guerin(at)rentec(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas? |
| Date: | 2004-10-29 20:01:03 |
| Message-ID: | 20052.1099080063@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice |
Michael Guerin <guerin(at)rentec(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Michael Guerin <guerin(at)rentec(dot)com> writes:
>>> Postgresql just reset itself, this is what I found in the log.
>>> FATAL: block 26 of 1663/17228/3425958479 is still referenced (local 2)
>>
>> You sure that's beta3? Because we reduced that error condition from
>> FATAL to ERROR between beta2 and beta3.
> PostgreSQL 8.0.0beta3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC)
> 3.3.1 (SuSE Linux)
Well, I'd sure be interested to see a test case to reproduce it, then.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-10-29 20:45:02 | Re: Using ALTER TABLESPACE in pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Michael Guerin | 2004-10-29 19:57:18 | Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-29 21:16:14 | Re: [NOVICE] Postgresql crash- any ideas? |
| Previous Message | Michael Guerin | 2004-10-29 19:57:18 | Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas? |