Re: Another list for windows port...

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Eric <ericg(at)conceptid(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Another list for windows port...
Date: 2004-10-18 21:49:21
Message-ID: 41743A61.2020600@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Eric wrote:

>It is possible to mainteners of this list to keep this list from
>"/$?%/$?/? windows problems? I don't care about windows. The worst
>thing never made was porting an excellent product like PostgreSQL to a
>poor server OS like windows.
>
>Now, we are invade with users that aren't used to read the manual...
>
>
You mean like most Linux users?

>I thought the topic of this list was to postgresql in general and not
>about WINDOWS SPECIFIQ PART.
>
>
It is general, which is why you get a lot of cross traffic. If you want
to see more specific topics you may
want to try the more specific lsits.

>So the solution is to do another list for them...
>
>
Uhm there is a list for them.

Remember the goal is the pervasiveness of PostgreSQL -- regardless of
platform.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>My opinion.
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-18 22:23:01 Re: Database Disappeared
Previous Message Eric 2004-10-18 21:38:17 Another list for windows port...