Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability
Date: 2004-09-29 23:05:19
Message-ID: 415B3FAF.5020700@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>>The big obstacle in moving anything is bandwidth. While any number
>>of companies will offer to host stuff for us, we can't match the
>>amount of bandwidth we're currently using in Panama
>
> ... which amounts to exactly what?

If it's helpful, I can ask my boss here if we're willing to host the PG
project.

Lots of bandwidth and grunty servers.

Any rough ballpark figures on the amount of bandwidth we'd have to
figure in? i.e. xxx per month?

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-09-29 23:13:20 Re: Server unreliability
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2004-09-29 22:29:42 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] web code update

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-09-29 23:13:20 Re: Server unreliability
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2004-09-29 22:29:42 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] web code update