Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability
Date: 2004-09-29 20:56:15
Message-ID: 200409292256.15323.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

Josh Berkus wrote:
> The big obstacle in moving anything is bandwidth. While any number
> of companies will offer to host stuff for us, we can't match the
> amount of bandwidth we're currently using in Panama

... which amounts to exactly what?

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-09-29 21:04:01 Re: Server unreliability
Previous Message elein 2004-09-29 20:54:38 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-09-29 21:04:01 Re: Server unreliability
Previous Message labs-groups2 2004-09-29 20:55:01 Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy