Re: Binaries for EOL version?

From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Binaries for EOL version?
Date: 2023-10-19 17:54:59
Message-ID: 40e90793-744f-4d8a-8b86-82495bc154ce@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On 10/19/23 12:30, Tom Lane wrote:
[snip]
> amcheck was not part of the Postgres source tree until v10.
> It might exist in some form for 9.6, but you'd have to look
> outside the standard distribution channels

amcheck_next96 binary RPM were absolutely distributed by
download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/9.6/redhat/rhel-6.

I downloaded amcheck_next96-1.4.1 when I downloaded 9.6.22, but did not
download amcheck_next96-1.4.5 with 9.6.24.

If push comes to shove, I can probably install the 1.4.1 RPM along side 9.6.24.

--
Born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Williams 2023-10-19 18:35:10 Re: postgresql14-contrib does not install with libpython 3.7
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-10-19 17:30:14 Re: Binaries for EOL version?