Re: Binaries for EOL version?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Binaries for EOL version?
Date: 2023-10-19 17:30:14
Message-ID: 3368392.1697736614@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Thanks.  postgresql-9.6.24-1-linux-x64-binaries.tar.gz doesn't seem to have
> amcheck, though.

amcheck was not part of the Postgres source tree until v10.
It might exist in some form for 9.6, but you'd have to look
outside the standard distribution channels - maybe github? -
and very likely compile from source.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron 2023-10-19 17:54:59 Re: Binaries for EOL version?
Previous Message Murthy Nunna 2023-10-19 17:08:52 RE: Vacuumdb on a table