From: | Robert Leach <rleach(at)princeton(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #18177: certain queries under certain contexts take multiple orders of magnitude longer compared to v10 |
Date: | 2023-11-07 16:43:14 |
Message-ID: | 40CF9E9D-35BE-4E52-8BA4-D9617AA66FB6@princeton.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
I haven't tried tweaking the `scale_factor` settings yet, but I did run the queries you requested. Attached are the results.

Rob
Robert William Leach
Scientific Programmer
133 Carl C. Icahn Lab
Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics
Princeton University
Princeton, NJ 08544
> On Nov 6, 2023, at 5:38 PM, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 11:17, Robert Leach <rleach(at)princeton(dot)edu> wrote:
>> ALTER TABLE "DataRepo_peakdata" SET (autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.0);
>> ALTER TABLE "DataRepo_peakdata" SET (autovacuum_vacuum_threshold = 5000);
>> ALTER TABLE "DataRepo_peakdata" SET (autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor = 0.0);
>> ALTER TABLE "DataRepo_peakdata" SET (autovacuum_analyze_threshold = 5000);
>>
>> I still don't like the fact that we have this database-architecture-specific code in our code-base that ties it to a specific database. I'm not sure if where I put it is the best place for it either. Is there a config file I can put these settings in?
>
> You can apply those changes globally in postgresql.conf, but having
> the autovacuum_vacuum_threshold / autovacuum_analyze_threshold set to
> that constant is unlikely to be very good for all tables. Perhaps
> there some scale_factor above 0.0 and below 0.2 that you can find that
> makes it run fast.
>
>> And I'm still curious why this wasn't necessary in postgres 10?
>
> If you show us the output of the following two queries:
>
> SELECT relname, reltuples,relpages,pg_relation_size(oid) from pg_class
> where oid = '"DataRepo_peakdata"'::regclass;
> select c.relname, c.reltuples, c.relpages, pg_relation_size(c.oid)
> from pg_class c inner join pg_index i on c.oid=i.indexrelid where
> i.indrelid = '"DataRepo_peakdata"'::regclass;
>
> run directly before the query in question both on PG10 and on PG13
> both when the query runs quickly and when it runs slowly. We might
> see something there that helps indicate what's going on.
>
> David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2023-11-07 17:04:23 | BUG #18187: Unexpected error: "variable not found in subplan target lists" triggered by JOIN |
Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2023-11-07 13:03:51 | BUG #18186: Question around integration |