From: | Manfred Spraul <manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Win32 port list <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Compiling libpq with VisualC |
Date: | 2004-06-14 05:32:37 |
Message-ID: | 40CD3875.3070005@colorfullife.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com wrote:
>>
>>What is the recommended way to create mutex objects (CreateMutex) from
>>Win32 libraries? There must be a clean way like there is in pthreads.
>>
>>
>
>A mutex is inherently a global object. CreateMutex(NULL, FALSE, NULL) will
>return a handle to an unowned mutex.
>
>
>
That's not the problem. Under pthread, it's possible to initialize a
mutex from compile time:
static pthread_mutex_t init_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
This means that the mutex is immediately valid, no races with the
initialization. I couldn't find an equivalent Win32 feature.
--
Manfred
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2004-06-14 06:21:34 | Re: File leak? |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-06-14 03:50:40 | Re: I just got it: PostgreSQL Application Server -- a |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-06-14 07:41:57 | Re: Installer |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-06-13 23:57:18 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [PATCHES] Compiling libpq with VisualC |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gary Doades | 2004-06-14 17:59:34 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Compiling libpq with VisualC |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-14 00:10:50 | Re: [PATCHES] Configuration patch |