| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: get rid of <foreignphrase> tags in the docs? |
| Date: | 2021-02-04 15:31:49 |
| Message-ID: | 4095779.1612452709@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> While looking at the proposed removal of the v2 protocol, I noticed that we
> italicize some, but not all, instances of 'per se', 'pro forma', and 'ad
> hoc'. I'd say these are widespread enough in formal registers of English
> that they hardly need to be called out as foreign, so I propose removing
> the tags for those words.
+1, nobody italicizes those in normal usage.
> The other case is 'voilà', found in rules.sgml. The case for italics here
> is stronger, but looking at that file, I actually think a more
> generic-sounding phrase here would be preferable.
Yeah, seeing that we only use that in one place, I think we could do
without it. Looks like something as pedestrian as "The results are:"
would do fine.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-02-04 15:35:13 | Re: Removing support for COPY FROM STDIN in protocol version 2 |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-02-04 15:25:48 | Re: Removing support for COPY FROM STDIN in protocol version 2 |