Re: get rid of <foreignphrase> tags in the docs?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: get rid of <foreignphrase> tags in the docs?
Date: 2021-02-04 15:31:49
Message-ID: 4095779.1612452709@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> While looking at the proposed removal of the v2 protocol, I noticed that we
> italicize some, but not all, instances of 'per se', 'pro forma', and 'ad
> hoc'. I'd say these are widespread enough in formal registers of English
> that they hardly need to be called out as foreign, so I propose removing
> the tags for those words.

+1, nobody italicizes those in normal usage.

> The other case is 'voilà', found in rules.sgml. The case for italics here
> is stronger, but looking at that file, I actually think a more
> generic-sounding phrase here would be preferable.

Yeah, seeing that we only use that in one place, I think we could do
without it. Looks like something as pedestrian as "The results are:"
would do fine.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-02-04 15:35:13 Re: Removing support for COPY FROM STDIN in protocol version 2
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-02-04 15:25:48 Re: Removing support for COPY FROM STDIN in protocol version 2