Re: the case for machine-readable error fields

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: the case for machine-readable error fields
Date: 2009-08-05 02:53:02
Message-ID: 407d949e0908041953w5bc00976y271b3d60cd228ef9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:43 AM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> And the funny thing is that the format we transmit this info to the
> client in is really the least interesting or difficult part of the
> whole matter ...

That in a nutshell is the problem with XML in the first place.

--
greg
http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-08-05 02:55:07 Re: Convert stmt back into queryString
Previous Message Joe Conway 2009-08-05 02:50:07 Re: async notification patch for dblink