Re: the case for machine-readable error fields

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: the case for machine-readable error fields
Date: 2009-08-05 01:43:34
Message-ID: 26478.1249436614@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 09:16:23PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> My serialization format kicks your serialization format's butt!

> I love standards. There are so many to choose from :)

And the funny thing is that the format we transmit this info to the
client in is really the least interesting or difficult part of the
whole matter ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-08-05 02:00:24 Re: Convert stmt back into queryString
Previous Message David Fetter 2009-08-05 01:33:33 Re: the case for machine-readable error fields