| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Update on PITR |
| Date: | 2004-04-01 01:22:35 |
| Message-ID: | 406B6EDB.5040406@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-pitr |
> Is your timeline based on the assumption of doing all the work yourself?
> If so, how about farming out some of it? I'd be willing to contribute
> some effort to PITR. (It's been made clear to me that Red Hat really
> wants PITR in 7.5 ;-))
What is RedHat's interest in PostgreSQL? Last time I heard they weren't
interested in their database product anymore. Why do they care about
the PostgreSQL project?
Of course, it's awesome that they are - but why? What's their plan?
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-04-01 02:50:21 | Re: Update on PITR |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2004-03-31 23:13:37 | Re: Best open source db poll currently |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-04-01 02:50:21 | Re: Update on PITR |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-04-01 00:07:48 | Re: The incompaitiblity of libpq and non-GCC compilers |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-04-01 02:50:21 | Re: Update on PITR |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-03-31 20:33:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Update on PITR |