From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Update on PITR |
Date: | 2004-04-01 03:25:37 |
Message-ID: | 20040331232457.F91030@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-pitr |
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Is your timeline based on the assumption of doing all the work yourself?
> > If so, how about farming out some of it? I'd be willing to contribute
> > some effort to PITR. (It's been made clear to me that Red Hat really
> > wants PITR in 7.5 ;-))
>
> What is RedHat's interest in PostgreSQL? Last time I heard they weren't
> interested in their database product anymore. Why do they care about
> the PostgreSQL project?
Just speculation, but I'd go with end goal being to be able to dump Oracle
altogether, once PostgreSQL actually has all the various enterprise
features ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-04-01 03:27:56 | Re: Best open source db poll currently |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-04-01 03:04:59 | Re: Aberdeen Study on OS RDBMS: exceprts and breakdown. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | pgsql | 2004-04-01 04:00:05 | GUID |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-04-01 02:50:21 | Re: Update on PITR |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Browne | 2004-04-01 19:42:05 | Re: Update on PITR |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-04-01 02:50:21 | Re: Update on PITR |