Re: VACUUM ANALYZE

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Ben-Nes Michael" <miki(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: VACUUM ANALYZE
Date: 2001-07-20 17:01:58
Message-ID: 4067.995648518@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Ben-Nes Michael" <miki(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il> writes:
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x4014d8e0 in ?? ()
> #1 0x8123a52 in ?? ()
> #2 0x8123a9f in ?? ()
> #3 0x8123caa in ?? ()
> [ etc ]

Sigh, that's no help at all :-(. Looks like you are using a postgres
executable that's been stripped of all symbolic information. Don't
suppose you want to compile from source to make a more debuggable copy?

Actually, maybe it's not quite no help at all. I'm going to guess from
the numeric values that the core dump is occurring in a system library
(since the top address is so far different from the rest). Since this
is a vacuum analyze, and since it's on a redhat machine, I'm going to
leap to a conclusion: maybe you are running into the known strcoll()
bug. Are you running glibc earlier than 2.2.3? If so, an update to
2.2.3 may fix it. See the thread at

http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=1021209

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marcelo Pereira 2001-07-20 17:46:42 Language C - Console-based FrontEnd
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-07-20 16:51:24 Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)