From: | "Ben-Nes Michael" <miki(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: VACUUM ANALYZE |
Date: | 2001-07-22 11:00:52 |
Message-ID: | 011101c1129d$93864420$aa5796d4@canaan.co.il |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
oops, mistake yes i am using older version.
glibc-2.1.94-3
glibc-devel-2.1.94-3
ill upgrade then ill compile with enable-debug
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Ben-Nes Michael" <miki(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM ANALYZE
> "Ben-Nes Michael" <miki(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il> writes:
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0 0x4014d8e0 in ?? ()
> > #1 0x8123a52 in ?? ()
> > #2 0x8123a9f in ?? ()
> > #3 0x8123caa in ?? ()
> > [ etc ]
>
> Sigh, that's no help at all :-(. Looks like you are using a postgres
> executable that's been stripped of all symbolic information. Don't
> suppose you want to compile from source to make a more debuggable copy?
>
> Actually, maybe it's not quite no help at all. I'm going to guess from
> the numeric values that the core dump is occurring in a system library
> (since the top address is so far different from the rest). Since this
> is a vacuum analyze, and since it's on a redhat machine, I'm going to
> leap to a conclusion: maybe you are running into the known strcoll()
> bug. Are you running glibc earlier than 2.2.3? If so, an update to
> 2.2.3 may fix it. See the thread at
>
> http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=1021209
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--------------------------
Canaan Surfing Ltd.
Internet Service Providers
Ben-Nes Michael - Manager
Tel: 972-4-6991122
http://sites.canaan.co.il
--------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mats Lofkvist | 2001-07-22 12:36:28 | Planner estimates cost of 'like' a lot lower than '='?? |
Previous Message | Ben-Nes Michael | 2001-07-22 10:39:20 | Re: VACUUM ANALYZE |