Re: Comparison of PGSQL and DB2

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: josh(at)postgresql(dot)org, Shashank Joshi <shashyajoshi(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Comparison of PGSQL and DB2
Date: 2004-03-12 01:47:40
Message-ID: 405116BC.8000205@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


>>>Federated Database Support
>>>(Ability to allow applications to access & perform JOIN operations on
>>
>>multiple disparate databases.)
>>
>>This is a feature which we do not have because it violates the ANSI SQL
>>Specification.

Dude - the reason we don't have it is because no-one can be bothered
coding it...nothing to do with the SQL spec...

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-03-12 01:55:39 Re: Comparison of PGSQL and DB2
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-03-12 01:45:08 Re: The big MySQL spin