Re: Comparison of PGSQL and DB2

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Shashank Joshi <shashyajoshi(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Comparison of PGSQL and DB2
Date: 2004-03-12 01:55:39
Message-ID: 200403111755.39590.josh@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Chris,

> >>This is a feature which we do not have because it violates the ANSI SQL
> >>Specification.
>
> Dude - the reason we don't have it is because no-one can be bothered
> coding it...nothing to do with the SQL spec...

?? I'm pretty sure that the SQL spec puts database at the top of the heirarchy
tree, and treats them as inviolate.

Unfortunately, my copy of Date is in storage. Can someone check this?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Advocacy Volunteer
http://advocacy.postgresql.org/
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2004-03-12 02:19:51 Re: The big MySQL spin
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-03-12 01:47:40 Re: Comparison of PGSQL and DB2