Re: Fixed width rows faster?

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: Mike Nolan <nolan(at)gw(dot)tssi(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>, Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>, Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixed width rows faster?
Date: 2004-03-06 04:20:29
Message-ID: 4049518D.70705@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

>>You don't consider a requirement that a field be no longer than a
>>certain length a reason not to use TEXT?

Can't you just create a TEXT(255) field same as you can just create
VARCHAR (with no length) field? I think they're basically synonyms for
each other these days.

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Nolan 2004-03-06 04:32:14 Re: Fixed width rows faster?
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2004-03-05 23:54:04 Re: Fixed width rows faster?