| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Michael Meskes" <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ECPG failure on BF member Vaquita (Windows Vista) |
| Date: | 2007-04-25 19:17:19 |
| Message-ID: | 4046.1177528639@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Does this help?
> (gdb) p var->ind_pointer
> $8 = (void *) 0x0
Well, that seems to be the reason why it's failing to indirect through
ind_pointer ... but why is it only failing on your machine and not
everyone else's? I think this indicates something unportable about
ecpg's usage of va_list.
Hmm, and I don't have to look far to find a smoking gun:
#if defined(__GNUC__) && (defined (__powerpc__) || defined(__amd64__) || defined(__x86_64__))
if (create_statement(lineno, compat, force_indicator, con, &stmt, query, args) == false)
#else
if (create_statement(lineno, compat, force_indicator, con, &stmt, query, &args) == false)
#endif
Why in the world is that like that? We don't have such a kluge
anyplace else we use va_list. stringinfo.c for instance has
never needed any such thing.
Mark, does your gcc define __powerpc__, or only __powerpc64__?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Wong | 2007-04-25 19:47:39 | Re: ECPG failure on BF member Vaquita (Windows Vista) |
| Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-04-25 19:11:22 | Re: strange buildfarm failures |