From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Mark Gibson <gibsonm(at)cromwell(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: dblink - custom datatypes NOW work :) |
Date: | 2004-02-24 06:11:19 |
Message-ID: | 403AEB07.2080109@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Two nitpicks (each applying in 2 places):
> First, testing for null rsinfo isn't sufficient, since the resultinfo
> mechanism could be used for other things; you need an IsA test too.
> Second, is "syntax error" really the most appropriate classification for
> this?
> (Also, the errmsg text seems a bit out of line with the wording of
> comparable errors, but I can't offer better text offhand.)
Thanks for the feedback, Tom. Here's what I ended up with:
if (!rsinfo || !IsA(rsinfo, ReturnSetInfo))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("function returning record called in context "
"that cannot accept type record")));
Joe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2004-02-24 06:19:13 | Re: [GENERAL] dblink: rollback transaction |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-24 05:58:13 | Re: Create Schema functionality question |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-02-24 07:57:10 | Re: Pl/Java - next step? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-24 05:13:50 | Re: user defined function in CHECK constraint |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2004-02-24 06:19:13 | Re: [GENERAL] dblink: rollback transaction |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-24 03:41:26 | Re: client_encoding in dump file |