Re: dblink - custom datatypes NOW work :)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Mark Gibson <gibsonm(at)cromwell(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: dblink - custom datatypes NOW work :)
Date: 2004-02-23 03:15:07
Message-ID: 20327.1077506107@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> I'd like to consider the attached a bugfix and apply for the upcoming
> 7.3.6 and 7.4.2 releases, as well as cvs tip. Any comments/objections?

Two nitpicks (each applying in 2 places):

> ! if (!rsinfo)
> ! ereport(ERROR,
> ! (errcode(ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR),
> ! errmsg("returning setof record is not " \
> ! "allowed in this context")));
> !

First, testing for null rsinfo isn't sufficient, since the resultinfo
mechanism could be used for other things; you need an IsA test too.
Second, is "syntax error" really the most appropriate classification for
this? Compare the code in functions.c:

ReturnSetInfo *rsi = (ReturnSetInfo *) fcinfo->resultinfo;

if (rsi && IsA(rsi, ReturnSetInfo))
rsi->isDone = ExprEndResult;
else
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("set-valued function called in context that cannot accept a set")));

(Also, the errmsg text seems a bit out of line with the wording of
comparable errors, but I can't offer better text offhand.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-02-23 04:32:00 Re: [GENERAL] dblink: rollback transaction
Previous Message Joe Conway 2004-02-23 02:03:08 Re: [GENERAL] dblink: rollback transaction

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-02-23 03:41:40 Re: Too-many-files errors on OS X
Previous Message Joe Conway 2004-02-23 01:21:23 Re: dblink - custom datatypes NOW work :)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-02-23 04:32:00 Re: [GENERAL] dblink: rollback transaction
Previous Message Joe Conway 2004-02-23 02:03:08 Re: [GENERAL] dblink: rollback transaction