Re: Re: pg_dump scripts are no longer ordinary-user friendly

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: pg_dump scripts are no longer ordinary-user friendly
Date: 2001-03-06 03:26:35
Message-ID: 4039.983849195@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> At 21:37 5/03/01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>>> ... we could go back to the old model of only updating
>>> pg_class in a data-only dump/restore.
>>
>> Works for me ...

> Should we have an option to turn off this feature entirely?

Now that you mention it, is it a feature at all? Or a bug? ISTM poor
form for a data-only restore to assume it may turn off all pre-existing
triggers.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2001-03-06 03:27:23 Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-03-06 03:24:11 Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster