From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster |
Date: | 2001-03-06 03:27:23 |
Message-ID: | 3AA4591B.CDDEB89D@wgcr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> If you think it's easy enough, enlighten the rest of us ;-).
> > If postgres reported PGDATA on the command line it would be easy enough.
> In ps status you mean? I don't think we are prepared to require ps
> status functionality to let the system start up... we'd lose a number
> of supported platforms that way.
That is one downside. A major downside. Again, alot of work to protect
the Barney Fife's out there.
> In the case of an actual crash and restart, postgres should come back up
> without help. However, the situation here is not a crash, it is
> incomplete admin intervention. I don't think that expecting the admin
Is it a correct assumption that this is the only time postmaster might
drop out?
But, thanks for the clarification, as I had misunderstood what you
meant.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-06 03:31:05 | Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-06 03:26:35 | Re: Re: pg_dump scripts are no longer ordinary-user friendly |