Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster
Date: 2001-03-06 03:27:23
Message-ID: 3AA4591B.CDDEB89D@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> If you think it's easy enough, enlighten the rest of us ;-).
> > If postgres reported PGDATA on the command line it would be easy enough.

> In ps status you mean? I don't think we are prepared to require ps
> status functionality to let the system start up... we'd lose a number
> of supported platforms that way.

That is one downside. A major downside. Again, alot of work to protect
the Barney Fife's out there.

> In the case of an actual crash and restart, postgres should come back up
> without help. However, the situation here is not a crash, it is
> incomplete admin intervention. I don't think that expecting the admin

Is it a correct assumption that this is the only time postmaster might
drop out?

But, thanks for the clarification, as I had misunderstood what you
meant.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-03-06 03:31:05 Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-06 03:26:35 Re: Re: pg_dump scripts are no longer ordinary-user friendly