Tom Lane wrote:
>Wait a minute. I am *not* buying into any proposal that we need to
>support ENABLE_THREAD_SAFETY on machines where libc is not thread-safe.
>We have other things to do than adopt an open-ended commitment to work
>around threading bugs on obsolete platforms. I don't believe that any
>sane application programmer is going to try to implement a
>multi-threaded app on such a platform anyway.
>
I'd agree - convince Bruce and I'll replace the mutexes in thread.c with
#error. But I think libpq should support a mutex around kerberos (or at
least fail at runtime) - right now it's too easy to corrupt the kerberos
authentication state.
--
Manfred