Re: libpq thread safety

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq thread safety
Date: 2004-01-11 17:45:27
Message-ID: 17158.1073843127@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Manfred Spraul <manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com> writes:
> + * Used to set callback that prevents concurrent access to
> + * non-thread safe functions that libpq needs.
> + * The default implementation uses a libpq internal mutex.
> + * Only required for multithreaded apps on platforms that
> + * do not support the thread-safe equivalents and that want
> + * to use the functions, too.
> + * List of functions:
> + * - stderror, getpwuid, gethostbyname.

Wait a minute. I am *not* buying into any proposal that we need to
support ENABLE_THREAD_SAFETY on machines where libc is not thread-safe.
We have other things to do than adopt an open-ended commitment to work
around threading bugs on obsolete platforms. I don't believe that any
sane application programmer is going to try to implement a
multi-threaded app on such a platform anyway.

As I said before, I think we should rip out the useless mutex code that
is already there, not introduce a "better" solution to a non-problem.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manfred Spraul 2004-01-11 18:11:16 Re: libpq thread safety
Previous Message Manfred Spraul 2004-01-11 17:33:31 Re: libpq thread safety