Re: oid dependency question...

From: Charles Tassell <ctassell(at)isn(dot)net>
To: andy(at)qabobala(dot)xapnet(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: oid dependency question...
Date: 2000-04-08 19:50:15
Message-ID: 4.2.0.58.20000408164541.009cba80@mailer.isn.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I'd recommend creating a table that holds the info on all your cached pages
(the link to the large object, and all of the product #'s of the items used
to generate the page) and then put an update/delete trigger on your main
products table that does a DELETE FROM cache_toc WHERE products.product_id
= cached_item

While OID's will work, you may run into problems when dumping/restoring
your database (pgdump doesn't dump OID's by default) so if you can avoid
them by using another field, you are probably better off. An OID is just
an unsigned int4 anyway.

At 05:18 PM 4/7/00, Andrew Schmeder wrote:
>Hi all... I just jumped on the postgres boat for a new project and I have a
>sort of 'design / theory' question.
>
>I am building a web application and I want to store pieces of the output
>in the
>database as large objects so that I don't have to recalculate them (I am
>predicting a sizeable CPU overhead for generating the pages...). So, lets say
>I render page X which contains a list of 10 items that were queried out of a
>bunch of different tables. Now I take that rendering and store it in my cache
>table... this is fine, but if any of those 10 items are changed I want the
>cache entry to automatically expire so that the page is recalculated next time
>it is requested. In another case a page will be dependent on the table itself
>(such as the insertion of a new record...).
>
>So far, I have learned that every row, table, etc in postgres can be
>associated
>to a globally unique object id (oid), correct? I tried to explore the system
>tables, pg_, etc but I could not find a table which actually just
>contained the
>oids, so I assume that this is hidden somewhere on a layer below the
>database... I want to know what the best method to implement this system will
>be... I am thinking triggers / store procedures? but where do I store
>them...
>on each table that may have a dependency?
>
>any advice would be appreciated...
>later,
>Andy

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charles Tassell 2000-04-08 19:54:20 Re: A Haunted Database
Previous Message Horst Herb 2000-04-08 17:25:29 transaction logging