Re: Adding CI to our tree

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Adding CI to our tree
Date: 2021-12-17 14:08:53
Message-ID: 3faa2e7d-a38d-9a01-e5e2-1f897905cebf@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 12/13/21 16:12, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attached is an updated version of the CI patches. An example of a test run
> with the attached version of this
> https://cirrus-ci.com/build/6501998521483264
>

Maye I have missed it, but why are we using ccache here? That seems a
bit pointless in an ephemeral instance.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jakub Wartak 2021-12-17 14:33:25 RE: In-placre persistance change of a relation
Previous Message Ronan Dunklau 2021-12-17 14:00:25 Re: Use generation context to speed up tuplesorts