Re: Adding CI to our tree

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Adding CI to our tree
Date: 2021-12-17 14:36:05
Message-ID: 1331967.1639751765@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Maye I have missed it, but why are we using ccache here? That seems a
> bit pointless in an ephemeral instance.

I believe Munro's cfbot tooling is able to save and re-use ccache
across successive instantiations of a build instance. I've not
looked at this code, but if it can do that there'd be point to it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2021-12-17 14:47:05 Re: Addition of --no-sync to pg_upgrade for test speedup
Previous Message Jakub Wartak 2021-12-17 14:33:25 RE: In-placre persistance change of a relation