From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Application name patch - v4 |
Date: | 2009-11-30 03:20:53 |
Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb0911291920n53a3e46dm87f2cfafbb52a0d2@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> Why doesn't application_name appear in postgresql.conf.sample?
>>> That is expected to be set from only libpq?
>>
>> It would seem pretty silly to set it in the conf file. You *can*,
>> if you want, but I see no reason to list it there.
>
> Yeah, I see your point. But, is it a policy not to put such parameter
> (other than that for debug) on postgresql.conf.sample?
Ooops! I missed GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE parameters. Sorry for noise.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2009-11-30 03:34:57 | Re: Add YAML option to explain |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2009-11-30 03:18:22 | Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication |