| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Application name patch - v4 |
| Date: | 2009-11-30 02:21:59 |
| Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb0911291821x26703cb8w5de80b85354b890a@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Why doesn't application_name appear in postgresql.conf.sample?
>> That is expected to be set from only libpq?
>
> It would seem pretty silly to set it in the conf file. You *can*,
> if you want, but I see no reason to list it there.
Yeah, I see your point. But, is it a policy not to put such parameter
(other than that for debug) on postgresql.conf.sample?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2009-11-30 02:23:39 | Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-11-30 01:20:02 | Re: Application name patch - v4 |