Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, "K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)" <niranjan(dot)k(at)nsn(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches
Date: 2009-03-02 02:11:45
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb0903011811g46231aaal8977e27976c2f338@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> While Simon stated it a bit strongly, I think it's important that you alert
> people if you think you have to remove existing features in order to make
> easy standby possible.

Now, I think that any existing capabilities don't need to be removed
for Synch Rep.

> It's possible that features which seem trivial to
> you are used extensively by people with particular failover requirements.

Of course, I have no intention of ignoring such people.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sushant Sinha 2009-03-02 02:59:31 Re: patch for space around the FragmentDelimiter
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-03-02 02:03:09 Re: WIP: named and mixed notation support