| From: | Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Variadic polymorpic functions |
| Date: | 2010-01-27 16:03:20 |
| Message-ID: | 3eff28921001270803q63dc472bsd476da0ce456e515@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
2010/1/27 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> 2010/1/27 Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it>:
>> But why still on separate schema?
>> I'd rather put them all in the public one, so you don't need the "pst." anymore.
>> Just like (most of) all other contrib mudules ...
>
> if you like, you can set a search_path
>
> it is cleaner than put all to public schema. I prefer ADA
> modul.function notation - it is more readable for me.
Correct, but then things like tablefunc should go in a separate schema.
I'd prefer to have consistency more than readability.
But that's just my opinion.
--
Vincenzo Romano
NotOrAnd Information Technologies
NON QVIETIS MARIBVS NAVTA PERITVS
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-01-27 16:05:42 | Re: Variadic polymorpic functions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-27 16:00:21 | Re: Variadic polymorpic functions |