From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Variadic polymorpic functions |
Date: | 2010-01-27 16:05:42 |
Message-ID: | 162867791001270805mbf43d35o424eef311ed52f2@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2010/1/27 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it> writes:
>> But why still on separate schema?
>> I'd rather put them all in the public one, so you don't need the "pst." anymore.
>> Just like (most of) all other contrib mudules ...
>
> If this were to get committed, it would definitely get made to look just
> like all the other contrib modules; so forget the separate schema.
>
I have not problem with it. Code to contrib module can be more
modificated. Current code is for pgfoundry and I prefer some
separation.
regards
Pavel
> But what I'm wondering is whether it should be contrib or in core.
> Is there some potential reason why someone might not want it installed?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vincenzo Romano | 2010-01-27 16:07:27 | Re: Variadic polymorpic functions |
Previous Message | Vincenzo Romano | 2010-01-27 16:03:20 | Re: Variadic polymorpic functions |