Re: Variadic polymorpic functions

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Variadic polymorpic functions
Date: 2010-01-27 16:05:42
Message-ID: 162867791001270805mbf43d35o424eef311ed52f2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

2010/1/27 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it> writes:
>> But why still on  separate schema?
>> I'd rather put them all in the public one, so you don't need the "pst." anymore.
>> Just like (most of) all other contrib mudules ...
>
> If this were to get committed, it would definitely get made to look just
> like all the other contrib modules; so forget the separate schema.
>

I have not problem with it. Code to contrib module can be more
modificated. Current code is for pgfoundry and I prefer some
separation.

regards
Pavel

> But what I'm wondering is whether it should be contrib or in core.
> Is there some potential reason why someone might not want it installed?
>

>                        regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vincenzo Romano 2010-01-27 16:07:27 Re: Variadic polymorpic functions
Previous Message Vincenzo Romano 2010-01-27 16:03:20 Re: Variadic polymorpic functions