From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Eudald Valcàrcel Lacasa <eudald(dot)valcarcel(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump negation regex |
Date: | 2020-05-07 17:36:38 |
Message-ID: | 3e1c0334-dcbf-54d1-1d51-939acf1d826d@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 5/7/20 9:53 AM, Eudald Valcàrcel Lacasa wrote:
> Hello!
> I've been looking at the documentation and there seems to be no keyword
> for negation purposes.
>
> Am I missing something? Or it's like this?
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/app-pgdump.html
-T pattern
--exclude-table=pattern
Do not dump any tables matching pattern. The pattern is interpreted
according to the same rules as for -t. -T can be given more than once to
exclude tables matching any of several patterns.
When both -t and -T are given, the behavior is to dump just the
tables that match at least one -t switch but no -T switches. If -T
appears without -t, then tables matching -T are excluded from what is
otherwise a normal dump.
For what patterns you can use see:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/app-psql.html#APP-PSQL-PATTERNS
>
> I'm trying to use pg_dump to create a database skeleton and I have
> tables like program_0, program_1, etc. And I'd like to dump all the
> tables but client_1 onwards.
>
> Does anybody happen to know a way to accomplish it?
>
> Thank you!
> Eudald
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amarendra Konda | 2020-05-07 17:49:18 | Re: Explain plan changes - IN CLAUSE ( Passing direct values Vs INNER Query ) |
Previous Message | Amarendra Konda | 2020-05-07 17:36:02 | Re: Explain plan changes - IN CLAUSE ( Passing direct values Vs INNER Query ) |