Re: Extremely slow DELETE with cascade foreign keys

From: Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr(dot)rosas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Extremely slow DELETE with cascade foreign keys
Date: 2017-12-05 17:22:45
Message-ID: 3c0737b6-091b-9de4-7d7a-51f78544fc0d@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Em 05-12-2017 14:43, Alvaro Herrera escreveu:
> Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
>
>> explain analyze delete from field_values where transaction_id=226;
>> QUERY PLAN
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  Delete on field_values  (cost=0.43..257.93 rows=481 width=6) (actual
>> time=367375.805..367375.805 rows=0 loops=1)
>>    ->  Index Scan using index_field_values_on_transaction_id on
>> field_values  (cost=0.43..257.93 rows=481 width=6) (actual time=0.223..4.216
>> rows=651 loops=1)
>>          Index Cond: (transaction_id = 226)
>>  Planning time: 0.234 ms
>>  Execution time: 367375.882 ms
>> (5 registros)
>>
>> Time: 367377,085 ms (06:07,377)
> Normally this is because you lack indexes on the referencing columns, so
> the query that scans the table to find the referencing rows is a
> seqscan.
>

Thank you, Álvaro, that was indeed the case, just like Tom Lane
suggested as well. I found the missing index and fixed it. Thanks :)

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-12-05 17:25:26 Re: Extremely slow DELETE with cascade foreign keys
Previous Message Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas 2017-12-05 17:00:41 Re: Extremely slow DELETE with cascade foreign keys