From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr(dot)rosas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Extremely slow DELETE with cascade foreign keys |
Date: | 2017-12-05 16:43:28 |
Message-ID: | 20171205164328.6t4w3abfpzp54y2y@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
> explain analyze delete from field_values where transaction_id=226;
> QUERY PLAN
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Delete on field_values (cost=0.43..257.93 rows=481 width=6) (actual
> time=367375.805..367375.805 rows=0 loops=1)
> -> Index Scan using index_field_values_on_transaction_id on
> field_values (cost=0.43..257.93 rows=481 width=6) (actual time=0.223..4.216
> rows=651 loops=1)
> Index Cond: (transaction_id = 226)
> Planning time: 0.234 ms
> Execution time: 367375.882 ms
> (5 registros)
>
> Time: 367377,085 ms (06:07,377)
Normally this is because you lack indexes on the referencing columns, so
the query that scans the table to find the referencing rows is a
seqscan.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas | 2017-12-05 17:00:41 | Re: Extremely slow DELETE with cascade foreign keys |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-12-05 16:27:14 | Re: Extremely slow DELETE with cascade foreign keys |