Re: Doubt in mvcc

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Rama Krishnan <raghuldrag(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Doubt in mvcc
Date: 2020-07-13 14:10:23
Message-ID: 3a94bd23-871c-571b-7f2c-adf9ee405f56@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 7/13/20 12:31 AM, Rama Krishnan wrote:
>
>
> Hi sir,
>
> I m preparing for interview one of the recruiter asked me mvcc drawbacks
> as i told due to mvcc it use more space and need to perform maintenance
> activity.
>
> Another one is the same data causes an update conflict because two
> different transactions can update the same version of the row.
>  he told its wrong, kindly tell me will you please tell me its correct
> or wrong?

It depends on what you are calling a conflict and what isolation level
you are in. Take a look at this section of the docs:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/transaction-iso.html
>
>
> Thanks
> RK

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2020-07-13 15:47:22 Re: Safe switchover
Previous Message Srinivasa T N 2020-07-13 14:07:58 Re: PostgresQL 12 - could not connect to server: FATAL: the database system is in recovery mode