Natural upgrade path for RedHat 9?

From: "D(dot) Dante Lorenso" <dante(at)lorenso(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Natural upgrade path for RedHat 9?
Date: 2004-01-09 03:13:41
Message-ID: 3FFE1C65.40107@lorenso.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

This isn't entirely PG related, but...

Does anyone know what the natural upgrade path from
RedHat 9 is? I'm wondering if anyone on the PostgreSQL
team is working with redhat to package and bundle versions
of PostgreSQL for the latest redhat.

Is there going to be a RedHat 10? Or are we all supposed
to choose a path of RH Enterprise vs Fedora Core? I have
about 10 to 20 Redhat 9 machines in dev/qa/production that
I'm trying to plan the futures for.

Any sysadmins/dbs wanna chime in on this? And no, no OS flame
wars...I just wanna know about RedHat9 --> going forward. This
is what I'm building now:

- RedHat 9
- PostgreSQL 7.4
- Apache 1.3.29 / Mod_SSL 2.8.16-1.3.29
<./source/mod_ssl-2.8.16-1.3.29.tar.gz>
- PHP 4.3.4
- Java J2SE 1.4.2

Like...for instance, will my build in 6 months look something
like this?

- RedHat 10, Fedora Core ?, RedHat Enterprise ?
- PostgreSQL 7.x
- Apache 2.x / Mod_SSL <./source/mod_ssl-2.8.16-1.3.29.tar.gz>
- PHP 5.0
- Java J2SE 1.5

Thanks,

Dante

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doug McNaught 2004-01-09 03:22:59 Re: Backend start-up failed FATAL : non-superuser
Previous Message Doug McNaught 2004-01-09 02:54:26 Re: Backend start-up failed FATAL : non-superuser