Re: Natural upgrade path for RedHat 9?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "D(dot) Dante Lorenso" <dante(at)lorenso(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Natural upgrade path for RedHat 9?
Date: 2004-01-09 05:03:27
Message-ID: 20628.1073624607@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"D. Dante Lorenso" <dante(at)lorenso(dot)com> writes:
> Is there going to be a RedHat 10? Or are we all supposed
> to choose a path of RH Enterprise vs Fedora Core?

The current plans do not include a Red Hat 10 --- Enterprise and Fedora
are it.

Now, I have been working for Red Hat long enough to know that their
product plans change constantly. It could be that some intermediate
product level will re-emerge. But I wouldn't bet on it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2004-01-09 05:35:37 Re: 7.4, 'group by' default ordering?
Previous Message Arnold Mavromatis 2004-01-09 04:32:44 How are NULLS stored on disk for PG 7.4?