From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com |
Cc: | "Tony (Unihost)" <tony(at)unihost(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please |
Date: | 2003-12-20 18:27:52 |
Message-ID: | 3FE494A8.5040807@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
John Sidney-Woollett wrote:
>It means that you can create stored procedures/functions which reside in
>the database that are written in java (as opposed to the native SQL
>programming language).
>
>Why would you want this? If you were more familiar with java than any of
>the currently supported procedural languages, then it means that you don't
>necessarily have to get to grips with another programming language.
>
>This would be a "nice to have" for Postgres too - I believe that it
>supports PL/pgSQL, PL/Tcl, PL/Perl, and PL/Python at present.
>
>
>
PostgreSQL supports more than just that including:
pl/php
pl/perl
pl/ruby
pl/python
pl/tcl
pl/c
pl/pgsql
pl/r
plr/bash (I think... or was that just pgBash?)
There was an beta (alpha?) of pl/Java at one time...
Personally I would stick with pl/python, pl/php, or pl/perl
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2003-12-21 00:14:51 | Re: Firebird and PostgreSQL at the DB Corral. |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-12-20 18:04:57 | Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please |