Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Paul Thomas <paul(at)tmsl(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, "pgsql-general (at) " "postgresql (dot) org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please
Date: 2003-12-20 18:04:57
Message-ID: 1071943497.1634.30.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I'm actually starting to write one of these for postgres, and apparently
there is another one in the works, from Thomas Hallgren.

There is at least one significant architectural issue here to deal with

Is it more desirable to have a single java vm and communicate via RPC,
or some other mechanism? ie sockets, or ? The alternative is to
instantiate a java vm for every connection, this could be onerous as
there would be considerable overhead for each java vm.

This will all go away as soon as java version 1.5 comes out but in the
meantime, what does everyone think

Comments are welcome.

Dave

On Sat, 2003-12-20 at 09:00, Paul Thomas wrote:
> On 20/12/2003 13:05 Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> > On Saturday 20 December 2003 16:44, John Sidney-Woollett wrote:
> > > It means that you can create stored procedures/functions which reside
> > in
> > > the database that are written in java (as opposed to the native SQL
> > > programming language).
> >
> > Does it mean mysql got stored procedures? Wow..
>
> I read it to mean user-defined functions only. Maybe I missed something?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-12-20 18:27:52 Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-12-20 16:22:11 Re: PostgreSQL speakers needed for OSCON 2004