From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Paul Thomas <paul(at)tmsl(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, "pgsql-general (at) " "postgresql (dot) org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please |
Date: | 2003-12-20 18:04:57 |
Message-ID: | 1071943497.1634.30.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I'm actually starting to write one of these for postgres, and apparently
there is another one in the works, from Thomas Hallgren.
There is at least one significant architectural issue here to deal with
Is it more desirable to have a single java vm and communicate via RPC,
or some other mechanism? ie sockets, or ? The alternative is to
instantiate a java vm for every connection, this could be onerous as
there would be considerable overhead for each java vm.
This will all go away as soon as java version 1.5 comes out but in the
meantime, what does everyone think
Comments are welcome.
Dave
On Sat, 2003-12-20 at 09:00, Paul Thomas wrote:
> On 20/12/2003 13:05 Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> > On Saturday 20 December 2003 16:44, John Sidney-Woollett wrote:
> > > It means that you can create stored procedures/functions which reside
> > in
> > > the database that are written in java (as opposed to the native SQL
> > > programming language).
> >
> > Does it mean mysql got stored procedures? Wow..
>
> I read it to mean user-defined functions only. Maybe I missed something?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-12-20 18:27:52 | Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-20 16:22:11 | Re: PostgreSQL speakers needed for OSCON 2004 |