Re: CVS HEAD compile failure

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CVS HEAD compile failure
Date: 2003-12-08 18:33:49
Message-ID: 3FD4C40D.6050409@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I've been able to reproduce this on one of my machines, and it's nasty.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>In that case I'm confused about why this code compiles on my machine:
>>
>>
>
>What compiler are you using? I'm using gcc 2.95.3 (on the machine that
>shows the failure), and I think Bruce is also using something less than
>the latest. It's possible that more recent gcc's are able to figure out
>that the reference to free_func should be interpreted as a parameter
>name and not a typedef.
>
>In fact, trying your test program fails here:
>
>$ gcc -Wall zzz.c
>zzz.c:8: parse error before `free_func'
>zzz.c:8: parse error before `)'
>$
>
>so "compiler difference" definitely seems to be the answer.
>
>
>
gcc version 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5)

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vivek Khera 2003-12-08 18:41:12 Re: autovacuum daemon stops doing work after about an hour
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-12-08 18:33:09 Re: aggregate + view + alias crash on 7.4 stable