From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CVS HEAD compile failure |
Date: | 2003-12-08 18:27:35 |
Message-ID: | 21821.1070908055@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've been able to reproduce this on one of my machines, and it's nasty.
> In that case I'm confused about why this code compiles on my machine:
What compiler are you using? I'm using gcc 2.95.3 (on the machine that
shows the failure), and I think Bruce is also using something less than
the latest. It's possible that more recent gcc's are able to figure out
that the reference to free_func should be interpreted as a parameter
name and not a typedef.
In fact, trying your test program fails here:
$ gcc -Wall zzz.c
zzz.c:8: parse error before `free_func'
zzz.c:8: parse error before `)'
$
so "compiler difference" definitely seems to be the answer.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-08 18:33:09 | Re: aggregate + view + alias crash on 7.4 stable |
Previous Message | ohp | 2003-12-08 18:05:05 | 73.5 and uw 713 |